SUP10
SUP10
SUP10 is a Spring Steels grade centred on high elastic strength and fatigue resistance under cyclic bending or torsion. This dossier separates sourced values from engineering guidance and comparison indices.
Complete introduction and metallurgical analysis
SUP10 belongs to Spring Steels and selection centres on high elastic strength and fatigue resistance under cyclic bending or torsion.
SUP10 is a Spring Steels grade centred on high elastic strength and fatigue resistance under cyclic bending or torsion. This dossier separates sourced values from engineering guidance and comparison indices.
The principal recorded elements are C≈0.51%, Si≈0.25%, Mn≈0.8%, P≈0.03%, S≈0.03%, Cu≈0.3%, Cr≈0.95%, V≈0.2%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits.
The expected microstructure is fine tempered martensite with surface quality and decarburisation under control; delivery condition, section size, melt quality and processing history can change that state.
Comparison indices are hardness 73/100, toughness 67/100, impact 74/100, wear 60/100 and bending 88/100. These are internal indices, not standard test results.
The screening temperature range is 150–300 °C; strength or hardness loss, oxidation, exposure time and creep must be assessed separately.
A representative process route is forming followed by quenching and tempering, with shot peening or presetting where specified. Obtain actual temperatures, times and cooling media from the grade and product data sheet.
Manufacturing indices are weldability 30/100, machinability 54/100, corrosion resistance 18/100 and fatigue resistance 81/100; use them for screening only.
The principal risk is fatigue cracking from surface defects, decarburisation, corrosion or tensile residual stress. Evaluate geometry, surface condition, environment and the governing failure mechanism together.
A similar name or calculated relationship is not proof of interchangeability; match chemistry, specification, condition, heat treatment and MTC.
Engineering conclusion: SUP10 is a rational candidate when high yield ratio and reliable elastic energy storage matches the real load, environment and certified product condition.
International equivalents and designations
A close counterpart is not automatically interchangeable. Confirm chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, dimensions and heat treatment.
Chemical composition and the role of each element
The principal recorded elements are C≈0.51%, Si≈0.25%, Mn≈0.8%, P≈0.03%, S≈0.03%, Cu≈0.3%, Cr≈0.95%, V≈0.2%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits. Composition is shown for screening and traceability. The current purchase standard and the heat-specific MTC remain authoritative.
| Element | Weight-percent range | Metallurgical role and effect |
|---|---|---|
| C | 0.47–0.55 % | Carbon raises hardness, strength and carbide potential; excessive carbon can reduce toughness and weldability. |
| Si | 0.15–0.35 % | Silicon supports deoxidation and solid-solution strength and can influence tempering or oxidation response. |
| Mn | 0.65–0.95 % | Manganese contributes to hardenability and sulfur control; its final effect depends on amount and processing. |
| P | ≤ 0.03 % | Phosphorus is normally restricted because higher content can promote embrittlement and reduce toughness. |
| S | ≤ 0.03 % | Sulfur may improve chip control in free-cutting grades but can reduce transverse toughness and weldability. |
| Cu | ≤ 0.3 % | Copper can improve atmospheric corrosion resistance or precipitation response in selected alloy systems. |
| Cr | 0.8–1.1 % | Chromium promotes hardenability and carbide formation and, at sufficient levels, corrosion or oxidation resistance. |
| V | 0.15–0.25 % | Vanadium refines grain and forms stable carbides that support wear resistance and secondary hardening. |
JIS special steel strip listing Sourced with conditions
Engineering behaviour and selection response
Hardness potential has an internal index of 73/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisToughness has an internal index of 67/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisImpact resistance has an internal index of 74/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisBending resistance has an internal index of 88/100 (very high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisAbrasive wear has an internal index of 60/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisCorrosion resistance has an internal index of 18/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisWeldability has an internal index of 30/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisMachinability has an internal index of 54/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisThe source catalog does not provide a universal temperature-property curve for this designation. Internal comparison index: 30/100.
Engineering analysisCreep resistance has an internal index of 12/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisFatigue resistance has an internal index of 81/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisNumerical scores are internal comparison indices. They are not standard test results, allowable design stresses or a manufacturer guarantee. Data Method
Hardness and hardenability
The internal hardness-potential index is 73/100 (high). Actual hardness depends on chemistry, section size, austenitising, quenching, tempering and test method.
high
Comparison indexGoverning factors
- Chemistry and section size
- Austenitising and quench severity
- Tempering temperature and time
- Test method and surface preparation
Data limits
Final acceptance requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition and heat-specific MTC.
Toughness, impact and fracture behaviour
Impact resistance is indexed at 74/100 and toughness at 67/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.
- Microstructure, hardness and grain size influence impact tolerance.
- Sharp radii, notches and surface defects reduce fracture resistance.
- Test temperature, specimen direction and section must be identified.
- For critical parts, accept impact energy only from a documented test of the same condition.
Service temperature, thermal stability and creep
The source catalog does not provide a universal temperature-property curve for this designation. 150–300 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.
Continuous service
150–300 °CEngineering guidanceReview the limit against strength or hardness loss and exposure time.
Intermittent service
Do not assign an intermittent limit without product-specific source data.
Tempering and phase stability
Working and coating temperatures must remain compatible with the tempering condition and required microstructure.
Oxidation and environment
Oxidation or corrosion may become limiting before the strength criterion.
The relative creep index is 12/100 (very low). It is not an allowable creep stress or rupture-life value.
Do not select this grade for long-term static high-temperature loading from the internal index alone.
Wear resistance and surface behaviour
Abrasive wear
The abrasive-wear index is 60/100; final hardness, carbides, microstructure, contact mode and lubrication govern actual resistance.
Comparison indexAdhesive wear
Assess adhesive wear with the counterface material, lubrication, roughness, pressure and temperature.
Engineering analysisSurface improvement
Evaluate surface treatment or coating only after confirming compatibility with chemistry, substrate and process temperature.
Engineering guidanceMechanical and physical properties
No complete sourced numerical mechanical set is stored for this condition; labelled comparison indices are shown instead of invented test values.
| Comparative property | Internal index | Information type |
|---|---|---|
| Hardness potential | 73 / 100 | Comparison index |
| Toughness | 67 / 100 | Comparison index |
| Impact resistance | 74 / 100 | Comparison index |
| Bending resistance | 88 / 100 | Comparison index |
| Abrasive wear | 60 / 100 | Comparison index |
| Corrosion resistance | 18 / 100 | Comparison index |
| Weldability | 30 / 100 | Comparison index |
| Machinability | 54 / 100 | Comparison index |
| High-temperature strength | 30 / 100 | Comparison index |
| Creep resistance | 12 / 100 | Comparison index |
| Fatigue resistance | 81 / 100 | Comparison index |
Physical properties
Density, elastic modulus, expansion and conductivity depend on family, temperature and product condition. Use grade- and product-specific values for precise calculations.
- Obtain density and expansion data from the product data sheet for dimensional calculations.
- Elastic modulus and conductivity vary with temperature.
Heat-treatment stages and process controls
The representative family route is forming followed by quenching and tempering, with shot peening or presetting where specified. Numerical temperatures are shown only when supported by the record.
Quenching / controlled cooling
Engineering guidanceChoose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.
Cooling: Grade-specificAnnealing / stress relief
Engineering guidanceAssess the supply condition, residual stress, section size and prior machining before selecting time and temperature.
Cooling: Grade- and process-specific coolingPreheating and austenitising
Engineering guidanceSet preheat steps and austenitising parameters from the grade/product data sheet and actual section size.
Cooling: Grade- and process-specific coolingQuenching / controlled cooling
Engineering guidanceChoose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.
Cooling: Grade- and process-specific coolingTempering / property adjustment
Engineering guidanceSet tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.
Cooling: Grade- and process-specific coolingTempering / property adjustment
Engineering guidanceSet tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.
Cooling: Grade- and process-specific coolingHardness, toughness, impact, temperature and process charts
Chemistry data retain their evidence label; 0–100 charts are internal indices and stages without temperature are process sequences.
Multi-axis engineering profile
Comparison indexChemical composition
Derived from source dataHardness–toughness balance
Comparison indexToughness, impact and fatigue
Comparison indexWear and surface response
Comparison indexMechanical properties or comparison indices
Comparison indexService temperature
Engineering guidanceHeat treatment
Engineering guidanceRelated-grade similarity
Comparison indexAll comparison indices
Comparison indexPotential failure modes and selection guidance
Potential failure mechanisms
- fatigue cracking from surface defects, decarburisation, corrosion or tensile residual stress.
- Fatigue initiation from surface defects, section transitions or stress concentration.
- Property loss after unsuitable heat treatment, cooling or finishing.
- Corrosion, oxidation or environmental attack when protection is inadequate.
Selection and design notes
- Match designation, material number, product standard and supply form before purchase.
- Compare the governing failure mechanism with hardness 73, toughness 67, impact 74 and wear 60 indices out of 100.
- Use mechanical values only within their cited condition, dimensions and test temperature.
- Confirm the heat-treatment route and target hardness with the processor before final machining.
- Review the heat number, MTC and required test results before release.
Derived calculations
Calculated from recorded inputs; apply only within the stated formula scope and limitations.
Advantages, limitations and unsuitable applications
Advantages
- high yield ratio and reliable elastic energy storage.
- A clearly labelled engineering profile supports comparison with related grades.
- Grade identity, chemistry, counterparts and references remain traceable in one dossier.
Limitations and weaknesses
- fatigue cracking from surface defects, decarburisation, corrosion or tensile residual stress.
- A 0–100 index cannot be converted into design stress, impact energy or creep life.
- Hardness and toughness depend on section, delivery condition and actual processing.
- Do not approve a substitute before checking the product standard and heat-specific MTC.
Cases requiring caution or an alternative material
Industrial applications and processing
Typical applications
- High-strength fasteners and mechanical connections
- Coil, leaf and torsion springs or resilient components
- Automotive powertrain, chassis or formed components
- coil and leaf springs
- stabiliser and torsion bars
- spring washers and elastic elements
- fatigue-loaded vehicle and machine components
Manufacture, welding and surface engineering
Weldability has an internal index of 30/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Forming and forging depend on steel family, delivery condition and the grade-specific qualified temperature range.
- Select nitriding, induction hardening or coating against chemistry, substrate hardness and application.
- Keep coating-deposition temperature compatible with the tempering condition and substrate.
- Control hydrogen embrittlement, residual stress and distortion in high-strength components.
Engineering conclusion and selection recommendation
SUP10 is worth evaluating when the principal need is high yield ratio and reliable elastic energy storage. Internal indices of hardness 73/100, toughness 67/100, impact 74/100 and wear 60/100 must be aligned with the real failure mechanism. The leading risk is fatigue cracking from surface defects, decarburisation, corrosion or tensile residual stress. Final approval requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition, heat treatment and heat-specific MTC.
Engineering analysisFrequently asked questions
What is SUP10 steel?
SUP10 is a Spring Steels grade centred on high elastic strength and fatigue resistance under cyclic bending or torsion. This dossier separates sourced values from engineering guidance and comparison indices.
What are the main applications of SUP10?
Application contexts include High-strength fasteners and mechanical connections, Coil, leaf and torsion springs or resilient components, Automotive powertrain, chassis or formed components and coil and leaf springs, subject to the product standard and actual condition.
How hard can SUP10 be?
The internal hardness-potential index is 73/100 (high). Actual hardness depends on chemistry, section size, austenitising, quenching, tempering and test method.
Is SUP10 suitable for impact loading?
Impact resistance is indexed at 74/100 and toughness at 67/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.
What is the service-temperature limit of SUP10?
The source catalog does not provide a universal temperature-property curve for this designation. 150–300 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.
Can SUP10 be replaced by a close grade?
Approve substitution only after matching chemistry, specification, product form, condition, heat treatment and MTC.
Engineering steel comparison
Compare this grade with any other dossier. Scores from 0 to 100 are internal screening indices, not laboratory values or allowable design stresses.
Current-grade chemistry
Second-grade chemistry
Current-grade heat treatment
Second-grade heat treatment
Current-grade applications
Limitations
Second-grade applications
Limitations
Select a second grade to update the comparison.
Sources, methodology and evidence
Sources support grade identity, recorded values or the engineering method. General guidance does not replace product-specific certification.
Grade-specific sources
Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: manufacturer catalog.
Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: manufacturer catalog.
Methodology and analysis sources
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Dossier reviewed: 2026-08-25 · Evidence status: Official identity plus sourced composition
Contact us for alloy-steel selection
Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel