Spring Steels Sourced numerical data plus engineering analysis

Material / Grade

1.7102

54SiCr6

Si-Cr spring steel for hot-rolled quenched and tempered springs.

Hardness potential74 / 100Comparison index

Toughness66 / 100Comparison index

Impact resistance73 / 100Comparison index

Bending resistance88 / 100Comparison index

Abrasive wear60 / 100Comparison index

Steel Overview

Complete introduction and metallurgical analysis

1.7102 / 54SiCr6 belongs to Spring Steels and selection centres on high elastic strength and fatigue resistance under cyclic bending or torsion.

Si-Cr spring steel for hot-rolled quenched and tempered springs.

The principal recorded elements are C≈0.55%, Si≈1.4%, Mn≈0.65%, P≈0.025%, S≈0.025%, Cr≈0.65%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits.

The expected microstructure is fine tempered martensite with surface quality and decarburisation under control; delivery condition, section size, melt quality and processing history can change that state.

Comparison indices are hardness 74/100, toughness 66/100, impact 73/100, wear 60/100 and bending 88/100. These are internal indices, not standard test results.

The screening temperature range is 150–300 °C; strength or hardness loss, oxidation, exposure time and creep must be assessed separately.

A representative process route is forming followed by quenching and tempering, with shot peening or presetting where specified. Obtain actual temperatures, times and cooling media from the grade and product data sheet.

Manufacturing indices are weldability 37/100, machinability 55/100, corrosion resistance 18/100 and fatigue resistance 81/100; use them for screening only.

The principal risk is fatigue cracking from surface defects, decarburisation, corrosion or tensile residual stress. Evaluate geometry, surface condition, environment and the governing failure mechanism together.

A similar name or calculated relationship is not proof of interchangeability; match chemistry, specification, condition, heat treatment and MTC.

Engineering conclusion: 1.7102 / 54SiCr6 is a rational candidate when high yield ratio and reliable elastic energy storage matches the real load, environment and certified product condition.

Recorded standards:EN 10089

International Equivalents

International equivalents and designations

A close counterpart is not automatically interchangeable. Confirm chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, dimensions and heat treatment.

EN / DIN / ISOOfficial designation for the same grade

54SiCr6

A registered identity within the same grade record.

EN / W.NrOfficial designation for the same grade

1.7102

A registered identity within the same grade record.

W.NrOfficial designation for the same grade

1.7102

A registered identity within the same grade record.

PrimaryOfficial designation for the same grade

54SiCr6

A registered identity within the same grade record.

Chemical Composition

Chemical composition and the role of each element

The principal recorded elements are C≈0.55%, Si≈1.4%, Mn≈0.65%, P≈0.025%, S≈0.025%, Cr≈0.65%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits. Composition is shown for screening and traceability. The current purchase standard and the heat-specific MTC remain authoritative.

Element	Weight-percent range	Metallurgical role and effect
C	0.51–0.59 %	Carbon raises hardness, strength and carbide potential; excessive carbon can reduce toughness and weldability.
Si	1.2–1.6 %	Silicon supports deoxidation and solid-solution strength and can influence tempering or oxidation response.
Mn	0.5–0.8 %	Manganese contributes to hardenability and sulfur control; its final effect depends on amount and processing.
P	≤ 0.025 %	Phosphorus is normally restricted because higher content can promote embrittlement and reduce toughness.
S	≤ 0.025 %	Sulfur may improve chip control in free-cutting grades but can reduce transverse toughness and weldability.
Cr	0.5–0.8 %	Chromium promotes hardenability and carbide formation and, at sufficient levels, corrosion or oxidation resistance.

EN 10089:2002 Sourced with conditions

Engineering Behaviour

Engineering behaviour and selection response

Hardness potential74 / 100

Hardness must be reported with delivery/heat-treatment condition; no single grade-wide value applies. Internal comparison index: 74/100.

Engineering analysis

Toughness66 / 100

Toughness has an internal index of 66/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

Impact resistance73 / 100

Impact resistance has an internal index of 73/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

Bending resistance88 / 100

Bending resistance has an internal index of 88/100 (very high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

Abrasive wear60 / 100

Wear resistance depends on final hardness, microstructure and wear mode; grade name alone is insufficient for substitution. Internal comparison index: 60/100.

Engineering analysis

Corrosion resistance18 / 100

Not stainless; surface protection is generally required in moist/corrosive service. Internal comparison index: 18/100.

Engineering analysis

Weldability37 / 100

Weldability has an internal index of 37/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

Machinability55 / 100

Machinability has an internal index of 55/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

High-temperature strength30 / 100

Temperature-dependent behavior varies with condition, exposure time, environment and product form; use sourced values for design. Internal comparison index: 30/100.

Engineering analysis

Creep resistance12 / 100

Creep resistance has an internal index of 12/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

Fatigue resistance81 / 100

Fatigue resistance has an internal index of 81/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

Numerical scores are internal comparison indices. They are not standard test results, allowable design stresses or a manufacturer guarantee. Data Method

Hardness & Hardenability

Hardness and hardenability

Hardness must be reported with delivery/heat-treatment condition; no single grade-wide value applies. Internal screening index: 74/100 (high).

74/100

high

Comparison index

Governing factors

Chemistry and section size
Austenitising and quench severity
Tempering temperature and time
Test method and surface preparation

Data limits

Final acceptance requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition and heat-specific MTC.

Impact & Toughness

Toughness, impact and fracture behaviour

Impact resistance is indexed at 73/100 and toughness at 66/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.

73/100highComparison index

Microstructure, hardness and grain size influence impact tolerance.
Sharp radii, notches and surface defects reduce fracture resistance.
Test temperature, specimen direction and section must be identified.
For critical parts, accept impact energy only from a documented test of the same condition.

Temperature & Creep

Service temperature, thermal stability and creep

Temperature-dependent behavior varies with condition, exposure time, environment and product form; use sourced values for design. 150–300 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.

Continuous service

150–300 °CEngineering guidance

Review the limit against strength or hardness loss and exposure time.

Intermittent service

Do not assign an intermittent limit without product-specific source data.

Tempering and phase stability

Working and coating temperatures must remain compatible with the tempering condition and required microstructure.

Oxidation and environment

Oxidation or corrosion may become limiting before the strength criterion.

Relative creep resistance12/100Comparison index

The relative creep index is 12/100 (very low). It is not an allowable creep stress or rupture-life value.

Do not select this grade for long-term static high-temperature loading from the internal index alone.

Wear & Surface Behaviour

Wear resistance and surface behaviour

Abrasive wear

Wear resistance depends on final hardness, microstructure and wear mode; grade name alone is insufficient for substitution. The abrasive-wear index is 60/100; final hardness, carbides, microstructure, contact mode and lubrication govern actual resistance.

Comparison index

Adhesive wear

Assess adhesive wear with the counterface material, lubrication, roughness, pressure and temperature.

Engineering analysis

Surface improvement

Evaluate surface treatment or coating only after confirming compatibility with chemistry, substrate and process temperature.

Engineering guidance

Mechanical & Physical Properties

Mechanical and physical properties

The record contains 1 sourced mechanical-property rows; each applies only to its stated condition, dimensions and test temperature.

Property	Value	Condition	Dimension	Test temperature
Brinell hardness	≤ 248 HB	Annealed as cited	According to the product data sheet	According to the cited test

Sourced with conditions

Physical properties

Young modulus≈ 210 GPaSourced with conditions

Density≈ 7.8 g/cm3Sourced with conditions

Heat Treatment

Heat-treatment stages and process controls

The representative family route is forming followed by quenching and tempering, with shot peening or presetting where specified. Numerical temperatures are shown only when supported by the record.

Heat-treatment stage

850–1150 °CSourced with conditions

Confirm every numerical parameter from the current product and process specification.

Cooling: air

Heat-treatment stage

860–890 °CSourced with conditions

Confirm every numerical parameter from the current product and process specification.

Cooling: air

Quenching / controlled cooling

800–840 °CSourced with conditions

Choose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.

Cooling: oil or polymer

Tempering / property adjustment

380–500 °CSourced with conditions

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: air

Annealing / stress relief

670–720 °CSourced with conditions

Assess the supply condition, residual stress, section size and prior machining before selecting time and temperature.

Cooling: controlled

Annealing / stress relief

Engineering guidance

Assess the supply condition, residual stress, section size and prior machining before selecting time and temperature.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling

Preheating and austenitising

Engineering guidance

Set preheat steps and austenitising parameters from the grade/product data sheet and actual section size.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling

Quenching / controlled cooling

Engineering guidance

Choose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling

Tempering / property adjustment

Engineering guidance

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling

Tempering / property adjustment

Engineering guidance

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling

Process control: Review delivery condition, actual section, equipment capability, crack and distortion risk and target hardness before approving the cycle.

Engineering Charts

Hardness, toughness, impact, temperature and process charts

Chemistry data retain their evidence label; 0–100 charts are internal indices and stages without temperature are process sequences.

Multi-axis engineering profile

Comparison index

Chemical composition

Derived from source data

Hardness–toughness balance

Comparison index

Toughness, impact and fatigue

Comparison index

Wear and surface response

Comparison index

Mechanical properties or comparison indices

Sourced with conditions

Service temperature

Engineering guidance

Heat treatment

Sourced with conditions

Related-grade similarity

Comparison index

All comparison indices

Comparison index

Failure Modes & Selection

Potential failure modes and selection guidance

Potential failure mechanisms

fatigue cracking from surface defects, decarburisation, corrosion or tensile residual stress.
Fatigue initiation from surface defects, section transitions or stress concentration.
Property loss after unsuitable heat treatment, cooling or finishing.
Corrosion, oxidation or environmental attack when protection is inadequate.

Selection and design notes

Match designation, material number, product standard and supply form before purchase.
Compare the governing failure mechanism with hardness 74, toughness 66, impact 73 and wear 60 indices out of 100.
Use mechanical values only within their cited condition, dimensions and test temperature.
Confirm the heat-treatment route and target hardness with the processor before final machining.
Review the heat number, MTC and required test results before release.

Derived calculations

Carbon equivalent CE(IIW)0.788 Calculated

Calculated from recorded inputs; apply only within the stated formula scope and limitations.

Advantages & Limitations

Advantages, limitations and unsuitable applications

Advantages

high yield ratio and reliable elastic energy storage.
A clearly labelled engineering profile supports comparison with related grades.
Grade identity, chemistry, counterparts and references remain traceable in one dossier.

Limitations and weaknesses

fatigue cracking from surface defects, decarburisation, corrosion or tensile residual stress.
A 0–100 index cannot be converted into design stress, impact energy or creep life.
Hardness and toughness depend on section, delivery condition and actual processing.
Do not approve a substitute before checking the product standard and heat-specific MTC.

Cases requiring caution or an alternative material

Critical design without condition- and section-specific test dataDirect substitution based only on name or similarity scoreLong-term creep service without sourced time–stress–temperature datafatigue cracking from surface defects, decarburisation, corrosion or tensile residual stress

Applications & Processing

Industrial applications and processing

Typical applications

High-strength fasteners and mechanical connections
Coil, leaf and torsion springs or resilient components
coil and leaf springs
stabiliser and torsion bars
spring washers and elastic elements
fatigue-loaded vehicle and machine components

Manufacture, welding and surface engineering

Weldability has an internal index of 37/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Forming and forging depend on steel family, delivery condition and the grade-specific qualified temperature range.

Select nitriding, induction hardening or coating against chemistry, substrate hardness and application.
Keep coating-deposition temperature compatible with the tempering condition and substrate.
Control hydrogen embrittlement, residual stress and distortion in high-strength components.

Engineering Conclusion

Engineering conclusion and selection recommendation

1.7102 / 54SiCr6 is worth evaluating when the principal need is high yield ratio and reliable elastic energy storage. Internal indices of hardness 74/100, toughness 66/100, impact 73/100 and wear 60/100 must be aligned with the real failure mechanism. The leading risk is fatigue cracking from surface defects, decarburisation, corrosion or tensile residual stress. Final approval requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition, heat treatment and heat-specific MTC.

Engineering analysis

Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel

Compare with other steels View similar steels

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions

What is 1.7102 / 54SiCr6 steel?

Si-Cr spring steel for hot-rolled quenched and tempered springs.

What are the main applications of 1.7102 / 54SiCr6?

Application contexts include High-strength fasteners and mechanical connections, Coil, leaf and torsion springs or resilient components, coil and leaf springs and stabiliser and torsion bars, subject to the product standard and actual condition.

How hard can 1.7102 / 54SiCr6 be?

Hardness must be reported with delivery/heat-treatment condition; no single grade-wide value applies. Internal screening index: 74/100 (high).

Is 1.7102 / 54SiCr6 suitable for impact loading?

Impact resistance is indexed at 73/100 and toughness at 66/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.

What is the service-temperature limit of 1.7102 / 54SiCr6?

Can 1.7102 / 54SiCr6 be replaced by a close grade?

Approve substitution only after matching chemistry, specification, product form, condition, heat treatment and MTC.

Steel Comparison

Engineering steel comparison

Compare this grade with any other dossier. Scores from 0 to 100 are internal screening indices, not laboratory values or allowable design stresses.

Close suggestions:

Search for the second steel

Current grade1.7102 / 54SiCr6Spring Steels

Selected gradeSUP6Spring Steels

Current-grade chemistry

Second-grade chemistry

Current-grade heat treatment

Second-grade heat treatment

Current-grade applications

Limitations

Second-grade applications

Limitations

Select a second grade to update the comparison.

Sources & Evidence

Sources, methodology and evidence

Sources support grade identity, recorded values or the engineering method. General guidance does not replace product-specific certification.

Grade-specific sources

Lucefin – 54SiCr6 / 1.7102Technical · Tier A

Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: technical.

View source

SIJ – 54SiCr6 / 1.7102Technical · Tier A

Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: technical.

View source

stahldaten.deOfficial material-number register · Tier A

Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: official material number register.

View source