Cold Work Tool Steels Official identity plus sourced composition
Material / Grade

BÖHLER K294

BÖHLER K294

Shaygan Steel

BÖHLER K294 is a Cold Work Tool Steels grade centred on wear resistance, compressive strength and dimensional control in cold-work tooling. This dossier separates sourced values from engineering guidance and comparison indices.

Hardness potential98 / 100Comparison index
Toughness5 / 100Comparison index
Impact resistance5 / 100Comparison index
Bending resistance34 / 100Comparison index
Abrasive wear98 / 100Comparison index
Steel Overview

Complete introduction and metallurgical analysis

BÖHLER K294 belongs to Cold Work Tool Steels and selection centres on wear resistance, compressive strength and dimensional control in cold-work tooling.

BÖHLER K294 is a Cold Work Tool Steels grade centred on wear resistance, compressive strength and dimensional control in cold-work tooling. This dossier separates sourced values from engineering guidance and comparison indices.

The principal recorded elements are C≈2.45%, Cr≈5.1%, Mo≈1.3%, V≈9.8%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits.

The expected microstructure is tempered martensite containing a grade-dependent population of primary and secondary alloy carbides; delivery condition, section size, melt quality and processing history can change that state.

Comparison indices are hardness 98/100, toughness 5/100, impact 5/100, wear 98/100 and bending 34/100. These are internal indices, not standard test results.

The screening temperature range is 150–300 °C; strength or hardness loss, oxidation, exposure time and creep must be assessed separately.

A representative process route is soft annealing, staged preheating, austenitising, controlled quenching and one or more tempering cycles. Obtain actual temperatures, times and cooling media from the grade and product data sheet.

Manufacturing indices are weldability 20/100, machinability 24/100, corrosion resistance 22/100 and fatigue resistance 29/100; use them for screening only.

The principal risk is chipping, cracking, grinding damage or distortion when toughness and carbide volume are not matched to the tool. Evaluate geometry, surface condition, environment and the governing failure mechanism together.

A similar name or calculated relationship is not proof of interchangeability; match chemistry, specification, condition, heat treatment and MTC.

Engineering conclusion: BÖHLER K294 is a rational candidate when high resistance to abrasive wear and plastic deformation in tooling matches the real load, environment and certified product condition.

Recorded standards:AISI A11
International Equivalents

International equivalents and designations

A close counterpart is not automatically interchangeable. Confirm chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, dimensions and heat treatment.

StandardOfficial designation for the same grade
BÖHLER K294
A registered identity within the same grade record.
BÖHLERClose counterpart requiring verification
BÖHLER K294
Match chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, heat treatment and MTC before substitution.
AISIClose counterpart requiring verification
A11
Match chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, heat treatment and MTC before substitution.
AISI / SAEConditional application alternative
AISI A11
Match chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, heat treatment and MTC before substitution.
Chemical Composition

Chemical composition and the role of each element

The principal recorded elements are C≈2.45%, Cr≈5.1%, Mo≈1.3%, V≈9.8%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits. Composition is shown for screening and traceability. The current purchase standard and the heat-specific MTC remain authoritative.

ElementWeight-percent rangeMetallurgical role and effect
C≈ 2.45 %Carbon raises hardness, strength and carbide potential; excessive carbon can reduce toughness and weldability.
Cr≈ 5.1 %Chromium promotes hardenability and carbide formation and, at sufficient levels, corrosion or oxidation resistance.
Mo≈ 1.3 %Molybdenum improves hardenability and temper resistance and can support hot strength or pitting resistance.
V≈ 9.8 %Vanadium refines grain and forms stable carbides that support wear resistance and secondary hardening.

BÖHLER Tool Steels and High Speed Steels program — average chemical composition Sourced with conditions

Engineering Behaviour

Engineering behaviour and selection response

Hardness potential98 / 100

Hardness potential has an internal index of 98/100 (very high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Toughness5 / 100

Toughness has an internal index of 5/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Impact resistance5 / 100

Impact resistance has an internal index of 5/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Bending resistance34 / 100

Bending resistance has an internal index of 34/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Abrasive wear98 / 100

Abrasive wear has an internal index of 98/100 (very high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Corrosion resistance22 / 100

Most tool steels are not selected primarily for corrosion resistance; high-Cr mould grades are exceptions. Internal comparison index: 22/100.

Engineering analysis
Weldability20 / 100

Weldability has an internal index of 20/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Machinability24 / 100

Machinability has an internal index of 24/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
High-temperature strength23 / 100

Temperature behavior depends on grade family and heat treatment; HSS/hot-work grades are designed for higher hot-property retention. Internal comparison index: 23/100.

Engineering analysis
Creep resistance18 / 100

Creep resistance has an internal index of 18/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Fatigue resistance29 / 100

Fatigue resistance has an internal index of 29/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

Numerical scores are internal comparison indices. They are not standard test results, allowable design stresses or a manufacturer guarantee. Data Method

Hardness & Hardenability

Hardness and hardenability

The internal hardness-potential index is 98/100 (very high). Actual hardness depends on chemistry, section size, austenitising, quenching, tempering and test method.

98/100

very high

Comparison index

Governing factors

  • Chemistry and section size
  • Austenitising and quench severity
  • Tempering temperature and time
  • Test method and surface preparation

Data limits

Final acceptance requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition and heat-specific MTC.

Impact & Toughness

Toughness, impact and fracture behaviour

Impact resistance is indexed at 5/100 and toughness at 5/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.

5/100very lowComparison index
  • Microstructure, hardness and grain size influence impact tolerance.
  • Sharp radii, notches and surface defects reduce fracture resistance.
  • Test temperature, specimen direction and section must be identified.
  • For critical parts, accept impact energy only from a documented test of the same condition.
Temperature & Creep

Service temperature, thermal stability and creep

Temperature behavior depends on grade family and heat treatment; HSS/hot-work grades are designed for higher hot-property retention. 150–300 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.

Continuous service

150–300 °CEngineering guidance

Review the limit against strength or hardness loss and exposure time.

Intermittent service

Do not assign an intermittent limit without product-specific source data.

Tempering and phase stability

Working and coating temperatures must remain compatible with the tempering condition and required microstructure.

Oxidation and environment

Oxidation or corrosion may become limiting before the strength criterion.

Relative creep resistance18/100Comparison index

The relative creep index is 18/100 (very low). It is not an allowable creep stress or rupture-life value.

Do not select this grade for long-term static high-temperature loading from the internal index alone.

Wear & Surface Behaviour

Wear resistance and surface behaviour

Abrasive wear

The abrasive-wear index is 98/100; final hardness, carbides, microstructure, contact mode and lubrication govern actual resistance.

Comparison index

Adhesive wear

Assess adhesive wear with the counterface material, lubrication, roughness, pressure and temperature.

Engineering analysis

Surface improvement

Evaluate surface treatment or coating only after confirming compatibility with chemistry, substrate and process temperature.

Engineering guidance
Mechanical & Physical Properties

Mechanical and physical properties

No complete sourced numerical mechanical set is stored for this condition; labelled comparison indices are shown instead of invented test values.

Comparative propertyInternal indexInformation type
Hardness potential98 / 100Comparison index
Toughness5 / 100Comparison index
Impact resistance5 / 100Comparison index
Bending resistance34 / 100Comparison index
Abrasive wear98 / 100Comparison index
Corrosion resistance22 / 100Comparison index
Weldability20 / 100Comparison index
Machinability24 / 100Comparison index
High-temperature strength23 / 100Comparison index
Creep resistance18 / 100Comparison index
Fatigue resistance29 / 100Comparison index

Physical properties

Density, elastic modulus, expansion and conductivity depend on family, temperature and product condition. Use grade- and product-specific values for precise calculations.

Engineering analysis
Heat Treatment

Heat-treatment stages and process controls

The representative family route is soft annealing, staged preheating, austenitising, controlled quenching and one or more tempering cycles. Numerical temperatures are shown only when supported by the record.

1

Quenching / controlled cooling

Engineering guidance

Choose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
2

Annealing / stress relief

Engineering guidance

Assess the supply condition, residual stress, section size and prior machining before selecting time and temperature.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
3

Preheating and austenitising

Engineering guidance

Set preheat steps and austenitising parameters from the grade/product data sheet and actual section size.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
4

Quenching / controlled cooling

Engineering guidance

Choose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
5

Tempering / property adjustment

Engineering guidance

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
6

Tempering / property adjustment

Engineering guidance

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
Process control: Review delivery condition, actual section, equipment capability, crack and distortion risk and target hardness before approving the cycle.
Engineering Charts

Hardness, toughness, impact, temperature and process charts

Chemistry data retain their evidence label; 0–100 charts are internal indices and stages without temperature are process sequences.

Multi-axis engineering profile

Comparison index

Chemical composition

Derived from source data

Hardness–toughness balance

Comparison index

Toughness, impact and fatigue

Comparison index

Wear and surface response

Comparison index

Mechanical properties or comparison indices

Comparison index

Service temperature

Engineering guidance

Heat treatment

Engineering guidance

Related-grade similarity

Comparison index

All comparison indices

Comparison index
Failure Modes & Selection

Potential failure modes and selection guidance

Potential failure mechanisms

  • chipping, cracking, grinding damage or distortion when toughness and carbide volume are not matched to the tool.
  • Fatigue initiation from surface defects, section transitions or stress concentration.
  • Property loss after unsuitable heat treatment, cooling or finishing.
  • Corrosion, oxidation or environmental attack when protection is inadequate.

Selection and design notes

  • Match designation, material number, product standard and supply form before purchase.
  • Compare the governing failure mechanism with hardness 98, toughness 5, impact 5 and wear 98 indices out of 100.
  • Use mechanical values only within their cited condition, dimensions and test temperature.
  • Confirm the heat-treatment route and target hardness with the processor before final machining.
  • Review the heat number, MTC and required test results before release.
Advantages & Limitations

Advantages, limitations and unsuitable applications

Advantages

  • high resistance to abrasive wear and plastic deformation in tooling.
  • A clearly labelled engineering profile supports comparison with related grades.
  • Grade identity, chemistry, counterparts and references remain traceable in one dossier.

Limitations and weaknesses

  • chipping, cracking, grinding damage or distortion when toughness and carbide volume are not matched to the tool.
  • A 0–100 index cannot be converted into design stress, impact energy or creep life.
  • Hardness and toughness depend on section, delivery condition and actual processing.
  • Do not approve a substitute before checking the product standard and heat-specific MTC.

Cases requiring caution or an alternative material

Critical design without condition- and section-specific test dataDirect substitution based only on name or similarity scoreLong-term creep service without sourced time–stress–temperature datachipping, cracking, grinding damage or distortion when toughness and carbide volume are not matched to the tool
Applications & Processing

Industrial applications and processing

Typical applications

  • Punches, dies and blanking tools
  • Industrial blades, knives and cutting tools
  • Cold-forming, drawing and cold-rolling tools
  • Wear-resistant machine and surface-contact components
  • blanking and forming dies
  • punches, shear blades and gauges
  • cold extrusion and drawing tools
  • wear-loaded tooling and precision inserts

Manufacture, welding and surface engineering

Weldability has an internal index of 20/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Forming and forging depend on steel family, delivery condition and the grade-specific qualified temperature range.

  • Select nitriding, induction hardening or coating against chemistry, substrate hardness and application.
  • Keep coating-deposition temperature compatible with the tempering condition and substrate.
  • Control hydrogen embrittlement, residual stress and distortion in high-strength components.
Engineering Conclusion

Engineering conclusion and selection recommendation

BÖHLER K294 is worth evaluating when the principal need is high resistance to abrasive wear and plastic deformation in tooling. Internal indices of hardness 98/100, toughness 5/100, impact 5/100 and wear 98/100 must be aligned with the real failure mechanism. The leading risk is chipping, cracking, grinding damage or distortion when toughness and carbide volume are not matched to the tool. Final approval requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition, heat treatment and heat-specific MTC.

Engineering analysis
Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel
Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions

What is BÖHLER K294 steel?

BÖHLER K294 is a Cold Work Tool Steels grade centred on wear resistance, compressive strength and dimensional control in cold-work tooling. This dossier separates sourced values from engineering guidance and comparison indices.

What are the main applications of BÖHLER K294?

Application contexts include Punches, dies and blanking tools, Industrial blades, knives and cutting tools, Cold-forming, drawing and cold-rolling tools and Wear-resistant machine and surface-contact components, subject to the product standard and actual condition.

How hard can BÖHLER K294 be?

The internal hardness-potential index is 98/100 (very high). Actual hardness depends on chemistry, section size, austenitising, quenching, tempering and test method.

Is BÖHLER K294 suitable for impact loading?

Impact resistance is indexed at 5/100 and toughness at 5/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.

What is the service-temperature limit of BÖHLER K294?

Temperature behavior depends on grade family and heat treatment; HSS/hot-work grades are designed for higher hot-property retention. 150–300 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.

Can BÖHLER K294 be replaced by a close grade?

Approve substitution only after matching chemistry, specification, product form, condition, heat treatment and MTC.

Steel Comparison

Engineering steel comparison

Compare this grade with any other dossier. Scores from 0 to 100 are internal screening indices, not laboratory values or allowable design stresses.

Close suggestions:
Current gradeBÖHLER K294Cold Work Tool Steels
VS
Selected gradeAISI A11Cold Work Tool Steels

Current-grade chemistry

Second-grade chemistry

Current-grade heat treatment

Second-grade heat treatment

Current-grade applications

    Limitations

      Second-grade applications

        Limitations

          Select a second grade to update the comparison.

          Sources & Evidence

          Sources, methodology and evidence

          Sources support grade identity, recorded values or the engineering method. General guidance does not replace product-specific certification.

          Grade-specific sources

          BÖHLER Tool Steels and High Speed Steels programManufacturer catalog · Tier A

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: manufacturer catalog.

          View source
          BÖHLER Austria product portalManufacturer Product Portal · Tier A

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: manufacturer product portal.

          View source

          Methodology and analysis sources

          TWI — Carbon equivalent formulae in relation to hydrogen cracking

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Outokumpu — Corrosion resistance and PRE/PREN

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Uddeholm — Cold work tooling technical guide

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Ovako Steel Navigator — Steel grades and material data sheets

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Laxcon Steels open grade dataset — CC BY 4.0

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Uddeholm — Orvar Supreme product data sheet

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source

          Dossier reviewed: 2026-08-25 · Evidence status: Official identity plus sourced composition

          Steel selection and availability

          Contact us for alloy-steel selection

          Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel

          +98 912 240 7139