High Speed Steels Official identity plus sourced composition
Material / Grade

AISI M1

AISI M1

Shaygan Steel

High-speed tool steel with alloy carbides for red-hardness at cutting-edge temperatures.

Hardness potential98 / 100Comparison index
Toughness39 / 100Comparison index
Impact resistance30 / 100Comparison index
Bending resistance55 / 100Comparison index
Abrasive wear98 / 100Comparison index
Steel Overview

Complete introduction and metallurgical analysis

AISI M1 belongs to High Speed Steels and selection centres on red hardness, cutting-edge wear resistance and high compressive strength.

High-speed tool steel with alloy carbides for red-hardness at cutting-edge temperatures.

The principal recorded elements are C≈0.815%, Mn≈0.3%, Si≈0.3%, Cr≈4.125%, Mo≈8.6%, V≈1.1%, W≈1.5%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits.

The expected microstructure is highly alloyed tempered martensite with a dense distribution of primary and secondary carbides; delivery condition, section size, melt quality and processing history can change that state.

Comparison indices are hardness 98/100, toughness 39/100, impact 30/100, wear 98/100 and bending 55/100. These are internal indices, not standard test results.

The screening temperature range is 450–600 °C; strength or hardness loss, oxidation, exposure time and creep must be assessed separately.

A representative process route is careful staged preheating, high-temperature hardening, rapid controlled cooling and multiple tempering. Obtain actual temperatures, times and cooling media from the grade and product data sheet.

Manufacturing indices are weldability 12/100, machinability 26/100, corrosion resistance 20/100 and fatigue resistance 50/100; use them for screening only.

The principal risk is grinding cracks, overheating, carbide segregation or brittle failure under shock loading. Evaluate geometry, surface condition, environment and the governing failure mechanism together.

A similar name or calculated relationship is not proof of interchangeability; match chemistry, specification, condition, heat treatment and MTC.

Engineering conclusion: AISI M1 is a rational candidate when retention of cutting hardness at elevated edge temperatures matches the real load, environment and certified product condition.

Recorded standards:AISI tool/stainless designation — verify governing ASTM/SAE/product specificationASTM A600 family
International Equivalents

International equivalents and designations

A close counterpart is not automatically interchangeable. Confirm chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, dimensions and heat treatment.

AISI / SAEOfficial designation for the same grade
AISI M1
A registered identity within the same grade record.
PrimaryOfficial designation for the same grade
AISI M1
A registered identity within the same grade record.
AISI shorthandOfficial designation for the same grade
M1
A registered identity within the same grade record.
EN / DIN / ISOConditional application alternative
HS2-9-1-8
Match chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, heat treatment and MTC before substitution.
Chemical Composition

Chemical composition and the role of each element

The principal recorded elements are C≈0.815%, Mn≈0.3%, Si≈0.3%, Cr≈4.125%, Mo≈8.6%, V≈1.1%, W≈1.5%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits. Composition is shown for screening and traceability. The current purchase standard and the heat-specific MTC remain authoritative.

ElementWeight-percent rangeMetallurgical role and effect
C0.75–0.88 %Carbon raises hardness, strength and carbide potential; excessive carbon can reduce toughness and weldability.
Mn0.2–0.4 %Manganese contributes to hardenability and sulfur control; its final effect depends on amount and processing.
Si0.2–0.4 %Silicon supports deoxidation and solid-solution strength and can influence tempering or oxidation response.
Cr3.75–4.5 %Chromium promotes hardenability and carbide formation and, at sufficient levels, corrosion or oxidation resistance.
Mo7.95–9.25 %Molybdenum improves hardenability and temper resistance and can support hot strength or pitting resistance.
V0.9–1.3 %Vanadium refines grain and forms stable carbides that support wear resistance and secondary hardening.
W1.15–1.85 %Tungsten forms hard carbides and supports hot hardness and abrasive-wear resistance in tool steels.

Laxcon open grade reference; tool-steel ranges sourced from ASTM A681/A686/A600 as noted by dataset Sourced with conditions

Engineering Behaviour

Engineering behaviour and selection response

Hardness potential98 / 100

Hardness and hardenability are condition-dependent; numeric values require grade-specific heat-treatment context. Internal comparison index: 98/100.

Engineering analysis
Toughness39 / 100

Toughness has an internal index of 39/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Impact resistance30 / 100

Impact resistance has an internal index of 30/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Bending resistance55 / 100

Bending resistance has an internal index of 55/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Abrasive wear98 / 100

Wear resistance depends on hardness, microstructure/carbides and the wear mechanism. Internal comparison index: 98/100.

Engineering analysis
Corrosion resistance20 / 100

Not stainless; surface protection is generally required in corrosive service. Internal comparison index: 20/100.

Engineering analysis
Weldability12 / 100

Weldability has an internal index of 12/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Machinability26 / 100

Machinability has an internal index of 26/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
High-temperature strength71 / 100

Temperature-dependent properties require grade-specific condition and test data. Internal comparison index: 71/100.

Engineering analysis
Creep resistance84 / 100

Creep resistance has an internal index of 84/100 (very high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Fatigue resistance50 / 100

Fatigue resistance has an internal index of 50/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

Numerical scores are internal comparison indices. They are not standard test results, allowable design stresses or a manufacturer guarantee. Data Method

Hardness & Hardenability

Hardness and hardenability

Hardness and hardenability are condition-dependent; numeric values require grade-specific heat-treatment context. Internal screening index: 98/100 (very high).

98/100

very high

Comparison index

Governing factors

  • Chemistry and section size
  • Austenitising and quench severity
  • Tempering temperature and time
  • Test method and surface preparation

Data limits

Final acceptance requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition and heat-specific MTC.

Impact & Toughness

Toughness, impact and fracture behaviour

Impact resistance is indexed at 30/100 and toughness at 39/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.

30/100lowComparison index
  • Microstructure, hardness and grain size influence impact tolerance.
  • Sharp radii, notches and surface defects reduce fracture resistance.
  • Test temperature, specimen direction and section must be identified.
  • For critical parts, accept impact energy only from a documented test of the same condition.
Temperature & Creep

Service temperature, thermal stability and creep

Temperature-dependent properties require grade-specific condition and test data. 450–600 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.

Continuous service

450–600 °CEngineering guidance

Review the limit against strength or hardness loss and exposure time.

Intermittent service

Do not assign an intermittent limit without product-specific source data.

Tempering and phase stability

Working and coating temperatures must remain compatible with the tempering condition and required microstructure.

Oxidation and environment

Oxidation or corrosion may become limiting before the strength criterion.

Relative creep resistance84/100Comparison index

The relative creep index is 84/100 (very high). It is not an allowable creep stress or rupture-life value.

Do not select this grade for long-term static high-temperature loading from the internal index alone.

Wear & Surface Behaviour

Wear resistance and surface behaviour

Abrasive wear

Wear resistance depends on hardness, microstructure/carbides and the wear mechanism. The abrasive-wear index is 98/100; final hardness, carbides, microstructure, contact mode and lubrication govern actual resistance.

Comparison index

Adhesive wear

Assess adhesive wear with the counterface material, lubrication, roughness, pressure and temperature.

Engineering analysis

Surface improvement

Evaluate surface treatment or coating only after confirming compatibility with chemistry, substrate and process temperature.

Engineering guidance
Mechanical & Physical Properties

Mechanical and physical properties

No complete sourced numerical mechanical set is stored for this condition; labelled comparison indices are shown instead of invented test values.

Comparative propertyInternal indexInformation type
Hardness potential98 / 100Comparison index
Toughness39 / 100Comparison index
Impact resistance30 / 100Comparison index
Bending resistance55 / 100Comparison index
Abrasive wear98 / 100Comparison index
Corrosion resistance20 / 100Comparison index
Weldability12 / 100Comparison index
Machinability26 / 100Comparison index
High-temperature strength71 / 100Comparison index
Creep resistance84 / 100Comparison index
Fatigue resistance50 / 100Comparison index

Physical properties

Density, elastic modulus, expansion and conductivity depend on family, temperature and product condition. Use grade- and product-specific values for precise calculations.

Engineering analysis
Heat Treatment

Heat-treatment stages and process controls

The representative family route is careful staged preheating, high-temperature hardening, rapid controlled cooling and multiple tempering. Numerical temperatures are shown only when supported by the record.

1

Quenching / controlled cooling

Engineering guidance

Choose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
2

Annealing / stress relief

Engineering guidance

Assess the supply condition, residual stress, section size and prior machining before selecting time and temperature.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
3

Preheating and austenitising

Engineering guidance

Set preheat steps and austenitising parameters from the grade/product data sheet and actual section size.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
4

Quenching / controlled cooling

Engineering guidance

Choose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
5

Tempering / property adjustment

Engineering guidance

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
6

Tempering / property adjustment

Engineering guidance

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
Process control: Review delivery condition, actual section, equipment capability, crack and distortion risk and target hardness before approving the cycle.
Engineering Charts

Hardness, toughness, impact, temperature and process charts

Chemistry data retain their evidence label; 0–100 charts are internal indices and stages without temperature are process sequences.

Multi-axis engineering profile

Comparison index

Chemical composition

Derived from source data

Hardness–toughness balance

Comparison index

Toughness, impact and fatigue

Comparison index

Wear and surface response

Comparison index

Mechanical properties or comparison indices

Comparison index

Service temperature

Engineering guidance

Heat treatment

Engineering guidance

Related-grade similarity

Comparison index

All comparison indices

Comparison index
Failure Modes & Selection

Potential failure modes and selection guidance

Potential failure mechanisms

  • grinding cracks, overheating, carbide segregation or brittle failure under shock loading.
  • Fatigue initiation from surface defects, section transitions or stress concentration.
  • Property loss after unsuitable heat treatment, cooling or finishing.
  • Corrosion, oxidation or environmental attack when protection is inadequate.

Selection and design notes

  • Match designation, material number, product standard and supply form before purchase.
  • Compare the governing failure mechanism with hardness 98, toughness 39, impact 30 and wear 98 indices out of 100.
  • Use mechanical values only within their cited condition, dimensions and test temperature.
  • Confirm the heat-treatment route and target hardness with the processor before final machining.
  • Review the heat number, MTC and required test results before release.
Advantages & Limitations

Advantages, limitations and unsuitable applications

Advantages

  • retention of cutting hardness at elevated edge temperatures.
  • A clearly labelled engineering profile supports comparison with related grades.
  • Grade identity, chemistry, counterparts and references remain traceable in one dossier.

Limitations and weaknesses

  • grinding cracks, overheating, carbide segregation or brittle failure under shock loading.
  • A 0–100 index cannot be converted into design stress, impact energy or creep life.
  • Hardness and toughness depend on section, delivery condition and actual processing.
  • Do not approve a substitute before checking the product standard and heat-specific MTC.

Cases requiring caution or an alternative material

Critical design without condition- and section-specific test dataDirect substitution based only on name or similarity scoreLong-term creep service without sourced time–stress–temperature datagrinding cracks, overheating, carbide segregation or brittle failure under shock loading
Applications & Processing

Industrial applications and processing

Typical applications

  • Punches, dies and blanking tools
  • Industrial blades, knives and cutting tools
  • Drills, mills, taps, broaches and high-speed machining tools
  • drills, taps and milling cutters
  • broaches, reamers and hobs
  • high-speed cutting tools
  • wear-resistant tooling requiring hot hardness

Manufacture, welding and surface engineering

Weldability has an internal index of 12/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Forming and forging depend on steel family, delivery condition and the grade-specific qualified temperature range.

  • Select nitriding, induction hardening or coating against chemistry, substrate hardness and application.
  • Keep coating-deposition temperature compatible with the tempering condition and substrate.
  • Control hydrogen embrittlement, residual stress and distortion in high-strength components.
Engineering Conclusion

Engineering conclusion and selection recommendation

AISI M1 is worth evaluating when the principal need is retention of cutting hardness at elevated edge temperatures. Internal indices of hardness 98/100, toughness 39/100, impact 30/100 and wear 98/100 must be aligned with the real failure mechanism. The leading risk is grinding cracks, overheating, carbide segregation or brittle failure under shock loading. Final approval requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition, heat treatment and heat-specific MTC.

Engineering analysis
Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel
Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions

What is AISI M1 steel?

High-speed tool steel with alloy carbides for red-hardness at cutting-edge temperatures.

What are the main applications of AISI M1?

Application contexts include Punches, dies and blanking tools, Industrial blades, knives and cutting tools, Drills, mills, taps, broaches and high-speed machining tools and drills, taps and milling cutters, subject to the product standard and actual condition.

How hard can AISI M1 be?

Hardness and hardenability are condition-dependent; numeric values require grade-specific heat-treatment context. Internal screening index: 98/100 (very high).

Is AISI M1 suitable for impact loading?

Impact resistance is indexed at 30/100 and toughness at 39/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.

What is the service-temperature limit of AISI M1?

Temperature-dependent properties require grade-specific condition and test data. 450–600 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.

Can AISI M1 be replaced by a close grade?

Approve substitution only after matching chemistry, specification, product form, condition, heat treatment and MTC.

Steel Comparison

Engineering steel comparison

Compare this grade with any other dossier. Scores from 0 to 100 are internal screening indices, not laboratory values or allowable design stresses.

Close suggestions:
Current gradeAISI M1High Speed Steels
VS
Selected grade1.3247 / HS2-9-1-8High Speed Steels

Current-grade chemistry

Second-grade chemistry

Current-grade heat treatment

Second-grade heat treatment

Current-grade applications

    Limitations

      Second-grade applications

        Limitations

          Select a second grade to update the comparison.

          Sources & Evidence

          Sources, methodology and evidence

          Sources support grade identity, recorded values or the engineering method. General guidance does not replace product-specific certification.

          Grade-specific sources

          Ovako Heat Treatment Guide — International grade listIdentity And Heat Treatment Model Reference · Tier A

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: identity and heat treatment model reference.

          View source
          Laxcon tool steel family and open grade datasetFamily Context And Composition Reference · Tier A-open-data

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: family context and composition reference.

          View source
          Laxcon Steel grade reference — Tool steelsGrade Composition · Tier A-open-data

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: grade composition.

          View source

          Methodology and analysis sources

          TWI — Carbon equivalent formulae in relation to hydrogen cracking

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Outokumpu — Corrosion resistance and PRE/PREN

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Uddeholm — Cold work tooling technical guide

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Ovako Steel Navigator — Steel grades and material data sheets

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Laxcon Steels open grade dataset — CC BY 4.0

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Uddeholm — Orvar Supreme product data sheet

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source

          Dossier reviewed: 2026-08-25 · Evidence status: Official identity plus sourced composition

          Steel selection and availability

          Contact us for alloy-steel selection

          Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel

          +98 912 240 7139