Hot Work Tool Steels Official identity plus sourced composition
Material / Grade

1.2581

X30WCrV9-3

Shaygan Steel

1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3 is a DIN/W.Nr dossier with source-traced identity and explicitly labeled engineering guidance.

Hardness potential81 / 100Comparison index
Toughness74 / 100Comparison index
Impact resistance78 / 100Comparison index
Bending resistance76 / 100Comparison index
Abrasive wear67 / 100Comparison index
Steel Overview

Complete introduction and metallurgical analysis

1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3 belongs to Hot Work Tool Steels and selection centres on hot hardness, thermal-fatigue resistance and toughness for cyclic hot-work service.

1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3 is a DIN/W.Nr dossier with source-traced identity and explicitly labeled engineering guidance.

The principal recorded elements are C≈0.3%, Si≈0.25%, Mn≈0.3%, P≈0.015%, S≈0.01%, Cr≈2.85%, W≈9%, V≈0.4%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits.

The expected microstructure is highly tempered martensite with stable secondary carbides and controlled prior-austenite grain size; delivery condition, section size, melt quality and processing history can change that state.

Comparison indices are hardness 81/100, toughness 74/100, impact 78/100, wear 67/100 and bending 76/100. These are internal indices, not standard test results.

The screening temperature range is 200–550 °C; strength or hardness loss, oxidation, exposure time and creep must be assessed separately.

A representative process route is staged preheating, high-temperature austenitising, low-distortion quenching and multiple tempering. Obtain actual temperatures, times and cooling media from the grade and product data sheet.

Manufacturing indices are weldability 12/100, machinability 43/100, corrosion resistance 19/100 and fatigue resistance 69/100; use them for screening only.

The principal risk is heat checking, gross cracking, softening or erosion when tool temperature and toughness are poorly controlled. Evaluate geometry, surface condition, environment and the governing failure mechanism together.

A similar name or calculated relationship is not proof of interchangeability; match chemistry, specification, condition, heat treatment and MTC.

Engineering conclusion: 1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3 is a rational candidate when retained strength and crack resistance under repeated heating and cooling matches the real load, environment and certified product condition.

Recorded standards:DINDIN / W.Nr cross-reference
International Equivalents

International equivalents and designations

A close counterpart is not automatically interchangeable. Confirm chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, dimensions and heat treatment.

EN / W.NrOfficial designation for the same grade
X30WCrV9-3 / 1.2581
A registered identity within the same grade record.
DIN / W.NrOfficial designation for the same grade
X30WCrV9-3
A registered identity within the same grade record.
W.NrOfficial designation for the same grade
1.2581
A registered identity within the same grade record.
Chemical Composition

Chemical composition and the role of each element

The principal recorded elements are C≈0.3%, Si≈0.25%, Mn≈0.3%, P≈0.015%, S≈0.01%, Cr≈2.85%, W≈9%, V≈0.4%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits. Composition is shown for screening and traceability. The current purchase standard and the heat-specific MTC remain authoritative.

ElementWeight-percent rangeMetallurgical role and effect
C0.25–0.35 %Carbon raises hardness, strength and carbide potential; excessive carbon can reduce toughness and weldability.
Si0.1–0.4 %Silicon supports deoxidation and solid-solution strength and can influence tempering or oxidation response.
Mn0.15–0.45 %Manganese contributes to hardenability and sulfur control; its final effect depends on amount and processing.
P0–0.03 %Phosphorus is normally restricted because higher content can promote embrittlement and reduce toughness.
S0–0.02 %Sulfur may improve chip control in free-cutting grades but can reduce transverse toughness and weldability.
Cr2.5–3.2 %Chromium promotes hardenability and carbide formation and, at sufficient levels, corrosion or oxidation resistance.
W8.5–9.5 %Tungsten forms hard carbides and supports hot hardness and abrasive-wear resistance in tool steels.
V0.3–0.5 %Vanadium refines grain and forms stable carbides that support wear resistance and secondary hardening.

X30WCrV9-3 — structured limits from the cited SteelNumber page Sourced with conditions

Engineering Behaviour

Engineering behaviour and selection response

Hardness potential81 / 100

Relative screening index only; obtain condition-specific hardness data. Internal comparison index: 81/100.

Engineering analysis
Toughness74 / 100

Toughness has an internal index of 74/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Impact resistance78 / 100

Impact resistance has an internal index of 78/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Bending resistance76 / 100

Bending resistance has an internal index of 76/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Abrasive wear67 / 100

Wear depends on hardness, microstructure and mechanism. Internal comparison index: 67/100.

Engineering analysis
Corrosion resistance19 / 100

Not stainless; surface protection is generally required in corrosive service. Internal comparison index: 19/100.

Engineering analysis
Weldability12 / 100

Weldability has an internal index of 12/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Machinability43 / 100

Machinability has an internal index of 43/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
High-temperature strength78 / 100

No sourced continuous maximum is claimed; the family window is screening guidance. Internal comparison index: 78/100.

Engineering analysis
Creep resistance76 / 100

Creep resistance has an internal index of 76/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Fatigue resistance69 / 100

Fatigue resistance has an internal index of 69/100 (high). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

Numerical scores are internal comparison indices. They are not standard test results, allowable design stresses or a manufacturer guarantee. Data Method

Hardness & Hardenability

Hardness and hardenability

Relative screening index only; obtain condition-specific hardness data. Internal screening index: 81/100 (high).

81/100

high

Comparison index

Governing factors

  • Chemistry and section size
  • Austenitising and quench severity
  • Tempering temperature and time
  • Test method and surface preparation

Data limits

Final acceptance requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition and heat-specific MTC.

Impact & Toughness

Toughness, impact and fracture behaviour

Impact resistance is indexed at 78/100 and toughness at 74/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.

78/100highComparison index
  • Microstructure, hardness and grain size influence impact tolerance.
  • Sharp radii, notches and surface defects reduce fracture resistance.
  • Test temperature, specimen direction and section must be identified.
  • For critical parts, accept impact energy only from a documented test of the same condition.
Temperature & Creep

Service temperature, thermal stability and creep

No sourced continuous maximum is claimed; the family window is screening guidance. 200–550 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.

Continuous service

200–550 °CEngineering guidance

Review the limit against strength or hardness loss and exposure time.

Intermittent service

Do not assign an intermittent limit without product-specific source data.

Tempering and phase stability

Working and coating temperatures must remain compatible with the tempering condition and required microstructure.

Oxidation and environment

Oxidation or corrosion may become limiting before the strength criterion.

Relative creep resistance76/100Comparison index

The relative creep index is 76/100 (high). It is not an allowable creep stress or rupture-life value.

Do not select this grade for long-term static high-temperature loading from the internal index alone.

Wear & Surface Behaviour

Wear resistance and surface behaviour

Abrasive wear

Wear depends on hardness, microstructure and mechanism. The abrasive-wear index is 67/100; final hardness, carbides, microstructure, contact mode and lubrication govern actual resistance.

Comparison index

Adhesive wear

Assess adhesive wear with the counterface material, lubrication, roughness, pressure and temperature.

Engineering analysis

Surface improvement

Evaluate surface treatment or coating only after confirming compatibility with chemistry, substrate and process temperature.

Engineering guidance
Mechanical & Physical Properties

Mechanical and physical properties

No complete sourced numerical mechanical set is stored for this condition; labelled comparison indices are shown instead of invented test values.

Comparative propertyInternal indexInformation type
Hardness potential81 / 100Comparison index
Toughness74 / 100Comparison index
Impact resistance78 / 100Comparison index
Bending resistance76 / 100Comparison index
Abrasive wear67 / 100Comparison index
Corrosion resistance19 / 100Comparison index
Weldability12 / 100Comparison index
Machinability43 / 100Comparison index
High-temperature strength78 / 100Comparison index
Creep resistance76 / 100Comparison index
Fatigue resistance69 / 100Comparison index

Physical properties

Density, elastic modulus, expansion and conductivity depend on family, temperature and product condition. Use grade- and product-specific values for precise calculations.

Engineering analysis
Heat Treatment

Heat-treatment stages and process controls

The representative family route is staged preheating, high-temperature austenitising, low-distortion quenching and multiple tempering. Numerical temperatures are shown only when supported by the record.

1

Annealing / stress relief

Engineering guidance

Assess the supply condition, residual stress, section size and prior machining before selecting time and temperature.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
2

Preheating and austenitising

Engineering guidance

Set preheat steps and austenitising parameters from the grade/product data sheet and actual section size.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
3

Quenching / controlled cooling

Engineering guidance

Choose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
4

Tempering / property adjustment

Engineering guidance

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
5

Tempering / property adjustment

Engineering guidance

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
Process control: Review delivery condition, actual section, equipment capability, crack and distortion risk and target hardness before approving the cycle.
Engineering Charts

Hardness, toughness, impact, temperature and process charts

Chemistry data retain their evidence label; 0–100 charts are internal indices and stages without temperature are process sequences.

Multi-axis engineering profile

Comparison index

Chemical composition

Derived from source data

Hardness–toughness balance

Comparison index

Toughness, impact and fatigue

Comparison index

Wear and surface response

Comparison index

Mechanical properties or comparison indices

Comparison index

Service temperature

Engineering guidance

Heat treatment

Engineering guidance

Related-grade similarity

Comparison index

All comparison indices

Comparison index
Failure Modes & Selection

Potential failure modes and selection guidance

Potential failure mechanisms

  • heat checking, gross cracking, softening or erosion when tool temperature and toughness are poorly controlled.
  • Fatigue initiation from surface defects, section transitions or stress concentration.
  • Property loss after unsuitable heat treatment, cooling or finishing.
  • Corrosion, oxidation or environmental attack when protection is inadequate.

Selection and design notes

  • Match designation, material number, product standard and supply form before purchase.
  • Compare the governing failure mechanism with hardness 81, toughness 74, impact 78 and wear 67 indices out of 100.
  • Use mechanical values only within their cited condition, dimensions and test temperature.
  • Confirm the heat-treatment route and target hardness with the processor before final machining.
  • Review the heat number, MTC and required test results before release.
Advantages & Limitations

Advantages, limitations and unsuitable applications

Advantages

  • retained strength and crack resistance under repeated heating and cooling.
  • A clearly labelled engineering profile supports comparison with related grades.
  • Grade identity, chemistry, counterparts and references remain traceable in one dossier.

Limitations and weaknesses

  • heat checking, gross cracking, softening or erosion when tool temperature and toughness are poorly controlled.
  • A 0–100 index cannot be converted into design stress, impact energy or creep life.
  • Hardness and toughness depend on section, delivery condition and actual processing.
  • Do not approve a substitute before checking the product standard and heat-specific MTC.

Cases requiring caution or an alternative material

Critical design without condition- and section-specific test dataDirect substitution based only on name or similarity scoreLong-term creep service without sourced time–stress–temperature dataheat checking, gross cracking, softening or erosion when tool temperature and toughness are poorly controlled
Applications & Processing

Industrial applications and processing

Typical applications

  • Hot-forging, die-casting and extrusion tooling
  • die-casting dies and cores
  • hot extrusion tooling
  • hot-forging dies
  • hot shear and forming tools

Manufacture, welding and surface engineering

Weldability has an internal index of 12/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Forming and forging depend on steel family, delivery condition and the grade-specific qualified temperature range.

  • Select nitriding, induction hardening or coating against chemistry, substrate hardness and application.
  • Keep coating-deposition temperature compatible with the tempering condition and substrate.
  • Control hydrogen embrittlement, residual stress and distortion in high-strength components.
Engineering Conclusion

Engineering conclusion and selection recommendation

1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3 is worth evaluating when the principal need is retained strength and crack resistance under repeated heating and cooling. Internal indices of hardness 81/100, toughness 74/100, impact 78/100 and wear 67/100 must be aligned with the real failure mechanism. The leading risk is heat checking, gross cracking, softening or erosion when tool temperature and toughness are poorly controlled. Final approval requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition, heat treatment and heat-specific MTC.

Engineering analysis
Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel
Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions

What is 1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3 steel?

1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3 is a DIN/W.Nr dossier with source-traced identity and explicitly labeled engineering guidance.

What are the main applications of 1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3?

Application contexts include Hot-forging, die-casting and extrusion tooling, die-casting dies and cores, hot extrusion tooling and hot-forging dies, subject to the product standard and actual condition.

How hard can 1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3 be?

Relative screening index only; obtain condition-specific hardness data. Internal screening index: 81/100 (high).

Is 1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3 suitable for impact loading?

Impact resistance is indexed at 78/100 and toughness at 74/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.

What is the service-temperature limit of 1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3?

No sourced continuous maximum is claimed; the family window is screening guidance. 200–550 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.

Can 1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3 be replaced by a close grade?

Approve substitution only after matching chemistry, specification, product form, condition, heat treatment and MTC.

Steel Comparison

Engineering steel comparison

Compare this grade with any other dossier. Scores from 0 to 100 are internal screening indices, not laboratory values or allowable design stresses.

Close suggestions:
Current grade1.2581 / X30WCrV9-3Hot Work Tool Steels
VS
Selected gradeAISI H21Hot Work Tool Steels

Current-grade chemistry

Second-grade chemistry

Current-grade heat treatment

Second-grade heat treatment

Current-grade applications

    Limitations

      Second-grade applications

        Limitations

          Select a second grade to update the comparison.

          Sources & Evidence

          Sources, methodology and evidence

          Sources support grade identity, recorded values or the engineering method. General guidance does not replace product-specific certification.

          Grade-specific sources

          steelnumber.comSource Inventory · Tier B

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: source inventory.

          View source
          steelnumber.comDesignation Context · Tier B

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: designation context.

          View source
          steelnumber.comDesignation cross-reference · Tier B

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: identity crosswalk.

          View source
          steelnumber.comComposition Source · Tier B

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: composition source.

          View source
          stahldaten.deOfficial material-number register · Tier A

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: official material number register.

          View source

          Methodology and analysis sources

          TWI — Carbon equivalent formulae in relation to hydrogen cracking

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Outokumpu — Corrosion resistance and PRE/PREN

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Uddeholm — Cold work tooling technical guide

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Ovako Steel Navigator — Steel grades and material data sheets

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Laxcon Steels open grade dataset — CC BY 4.0

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Uddeholm — Orvar Supreme product data sheet

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source

          Dossier reviewed: 2026-08-25 · Evidence status: Official identity plus sourced composition

          Steel selection and availability

          Contact us for alloy-steel selection

          Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel

          +98 912 240 7139