Cold Work Tool Steels Sourced numerical data plus engineering analysis
Material / Grade

1.2379

X153CrMoV12

Shaygan Steel

A high-carbon high-chromium ledeburitic cold-work tool steel associated with 1.2379/D2, emphasizing abrasive wear resistance and compressive strength.

Hardness potential98 / 100Comparison index
Toughness17 / 100Comparison index
Impact resistance12 / 100Comparison index
Bending resistance45 / 100Comparison index
Abrasive wear98 / 100Comparison index
Steel Overview

Complete introduction and metallurgical analysis

1.2379 / X153CrMoV12 belongs to Cold Work Tool Steels and selection centres on wear resistance, compressive strength and dimensional control in cold-work tooling.

A high-carbon high-chromium ledeburitic cold-work tool steel associated with 1.2379/D2, emphasizing abrasive wear resistance and compressive strength.

The principal recorded elements are C≈1.55%, Si≈0.3%, Mn≈0.3%, Cr≈11.3%, Mo≈0.75%, V≈0.75%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits.

The expected microstructure is tempered martensite containing a grade-dependent population of primary and secondary alloy carbides; delivery condition, section size, melt quality and processing history can change that state.

Comparison indices are hardness 98/100, toughness 17/100, impact 12/100, wear 98/100 and bending 45/100. These are internal indices, not standard test results.

The screening temperature range is 150–300 °C; strength or hardness loss, oxidation, exposure time and creep must be assessed separately.

A representative process route is soft annealing, staged preheating, austenitising, controlled quenching and one or more tempering cycles. Obtain actual temperatures, times and cooling media from the grade and product data sheet.

Manufacturing indices are weldability 20/100, machinability 32/100, corrosion resistance 22/100 and fatigue resistance 38/100; use them for screening only.

The principal risk is chipping, cracking, grinding damage or distortion when toughness and carbide volume are not matched to the tool. Evaluate geometry, surface condition, environment and the governing failure mechanism together.

A similar name or calculated relationship is not proof of interchangeability; match chemistry, specification, condition, heat treatment and MTC.

Engineering conclusion: 1.2379 / X153CrMoV12 is a rational candidate when high resistance to abrasive wear and plastic deformation in tooling matches the real load, environment and certified product condition.

Recorded standards:ISO 4957:2018
International Equivalents

International equivalents and designations

A close counterpart is not automatically interchangeable. Confirm chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, dimensions and heat treatment.

EN / DIN / ISOOfficial designation for the same grade
X153CrMoV12
A registered identity within the same grade record.
EN / W.NrOfficial designation for the same grade
1.2379
A registered identity within the same grade record.
W.NrOfficial designation for the same grade
1.2379
A registered identity within the same grade record.
PrimaryOfficial designation for the same grade
X153CrMoV12
A registered identity within the same grade record.
Chemical Composition

Chemical composition and the role of each element

The principal recorded elements are C≈1.55%, Si≈0.3%, Mn≈0.3%, Cr≈11.3%, Mo≈0.75%, V≈0.75%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits. Composition is shown for screening and traceability. The current purchase standard and the heat-specific MTC remain authoritative.

ElementWeight-percent rangeMetallurgical role and effect
C1.55–1.55 %Carbon raises hardness, strength and carbide potential; excessive carbon can reduce toughness and weldability.
Si0.3–0.3 %Silicon supports deoxidation and solid-solution strength and can influence tempering or oxidation response.
Mn0.3–0.3 %Manganese contributes to hardenability and sulfur control; its final effect depends on amount and processing.
Cr11.3–11.3 %Chromium promotes hardenability and carbide formation and, at sufficient levels, corrosion or oxidation resistance.
Mo0.75–0.75 %Molybdenum improves hardenability and temper resistance and can support hot strength or pitting resistance.
V0.75–0.75 %Vanadium refines grain and forms stable carbides that support wear resistance and secondary hardening.

BÖHLER K110 — manufacturer average Sourced with conditions

Engineering Behaviour

Engineering behaviour and selection response

Hardness potential98 / 100

Hardenable; actual hardness depends on chemistry, section size, austenitizing, quench and tempering. Internal comparison index: 98/100.

Engineering analysis
Toughness17 / 100

Toughness has an internal index of 17/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Impact resistance12 / 100

Impact resistance has an internal index of 12/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Bending resistance45 / 100

Bending resistance has an internal index of 45/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Abrasive wear98 / 100

Wear resistance depends on final hardness, microstructure and wear mode; grade name alone is insufficient for substitution. Internal comparison index: 98/100.

Engineering analysis
Corrosion resistance22 / 100

Not stainless; surface protection is generally required in moist/corrosive service. Internal comparison index: 22/100.

Engineering analysis
Weldability20 / 100

Weldability has an internal index of 20/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Machinability32 / 100

Machinability has an internal index of 32/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
High-temperature strength21 / 100

Temperature-dependent behavior varies with condition, exposure time, environment and product form; use sourced values for design. Internal comparison index: 21/100.

Engineering analysis
Creep resistance18 / 100

Creep resistance has an internal index of 18/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis
Fatigue resistance38 / 100

Fatigue resistance has an internal index of 38/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Engineering analysis

Numerical scores are internal comparison indices. They are not standard test results, allowable design stresses or a manufacturer guarantee. Data Method

Hardness & Hardenability

Hardness and hardenability

Hardenable; actual hardness depends on chemistry, section size, austenitizing, quench and tempering. Internal screening index: 98/100 (very high).

98/100

very high

Comparison index

Governing factors

  • Chemistry and section size
  • Austenitising and quench severity
  • Tempering temperature and time
  • Test method and surface preparation

Data limits

Final acceptance requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition and heat-specific MTC.

Impact & Toughness

Toughness, impact and fracture behaviour

Impact resistance is indexed at 12/100 and toughness at 17/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.

12/100very lowComparison index
  • Microstructure, hardness and grain size influence impact tolerance.
  • Sharp radii, notches and surface defects reduce fracture resistance.
  • Test temperature, specimen direction and section must be identified.
  • For critical parts, accept impact energy only from a documented test of the same condition.
Temperature & Creep

Service temperature, thermal stability and creep

Temperature-dependent behavior varies with condition, exposure time, environment and product form; use sourced values for design. 150–300 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.

Continuous service

150–300 °CEngineering guidance

Review the limit against strength or hardness loss and exposure time.

Intermittent service

Do not assign an intermittent limit without product-specific source data.

Tempering and phase stability

Working and coating temperatures must remain compatible with the tempering condition and required microstructure.

Oxidation and environment

Oxidation or corrosion may become limiting before the strength criterion.

Relative creep resistance18/100Comparison index

The relative creep index is 18/100 (very low). It is not an allowable creep stress or rupture-life value.

Do not select this grade for long-term static high-temperature loading from the internal index alone.

Wear & Surface Behaviour

Wear resistance and surface behaviour

Abrasive wear

Wear resistance depends on final hardness, microstructure and wear mode; grade name alone is insufficient for substitution. The abrasive-wear index is 98/100; final hardness, carbides, microstructure, contact mode and lubrication govern actual resistance.

Comparison index

Adhesive wear

Assess adhesive wear with the counterface material, lubrication, roughness, pressure and temperature.

Engineering analysis

Surface improvement

Evaluate surface treatment or coating only after confirming compatibility with chemistry, substrate and process temperature.

Engineering guidance
Mechanical & Physical Properties

Mechanical and physical properties

The record contains 1 sourced mechanical-property rows; each applies only to its stated condition, dimensions and test temperature.

PropertyValueConditionDimensionTest temperature
Delivery hardness≈ 210 HBAnnealed as citedAccording to the product data sheetAccording to the cited test
Sourced with conditions

Physical properties

Density, elastic modulus, expansion and conductivity depend on family, temperature and product condition. Use grade- and product-specific values for precise calculations.

Engineering analysis
Heat Treatment

Heat-treatment stages and process controls

The representative family route is soft annealing, staged preheating, austenitising, controlled quenching and one or more tempering cycles. Numerical temperatures are shown only when supported by the record.

1

Annealing / stress relief

Engineering guidance

Assess the supply condition, residual stress, section size and prior machining before selecting time and temperature.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
2

Preheating and austenitising

Engineering guidance

Set preheat steps and austenitising parameters from the grade/product data sheet and actual section size.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
3

Quenching / controlled cooling

Engineering guidance

Choose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
4

Tempering / property adjustment

Engineering guidance

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
5

Tempering / property adjustment

Engineering guidance

Set tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.

Cooling: Grade- and process-specific cooling
Process control: Review delivery condition, actual section, equipment capability, crack and distortion risk and target hardness before approving the cycle.
Engineering Charts

Hardness, toughness, impact, temperature and process charts

Chemistry data retain their evidence label; 0–100 charts are internal indices and stages without temperature are process sequences.

Multi-axis engineering profile

Comparison index

Chemical composition

Derived from source data

Hardness–toughness balance

Comparison index

Toughness, impact and fatigue

Comparison index

Wear and surface response

Comparison index

Mechanical properties or comparison indices

Sourced with conditions

Service temperature

Engineering guidance

Heat treatment

Engineering guidance

Related-grade similarity

Comparison index

All comparison indices

Comparison index
Failure Modes & Selection

Potential failure modes and selection guidance

Potential failure mechanisms

  • chipping, cracking, grinding damage or distortion when toughness and carbide volume are not matched to the tool.
  • Fatigue initiation from surface defects, section transitions or stress concentration.
  • Property loss after unsuitable heat treatment, cooling or finishing.
  • Corrosion, oxidation or environmental attack when protection is inadequate.

Selection and design notes

  • Match designation, material number, product standard and supply form before purchase.
  • Compare the governing failure mechanism with hardness 98, toughness 17, impact 12 and wear 98 indices out of 100.
  • Use mechanical values only within their cited condition, dimensions and test temperature.
  • Confirm the heat-treatment route and target hardness with the processor before final machining.
  • Review the heat number, MTC and required test results before release.
Advantages & Limitations

Advantages, limitations and unsuitable applications

Advantages

  • high resistance to abrasive wear and plastic deformation in tooling.
  • A clearly labelled engineering profile supports comparison with related grades.
  • Grade identity, chemistry, counterparts and references remain traceable in one dossier.

Limitations and weaknesses

  • chipping, cracking, grinding damage or distortion when toughness and carbide volume are not matched to the tool.
  • A 0–100 index cannot be converted into design stress, impact energy or creep life.
  • Hardness and toughness depend on section, delivery condition and actual processing.
  • Do not approve a substitute before checking the product standard and heat-specific MTC.

Cases requiring caution or an alternative material

Critical design without condition- and section-specific test dataDirect substitution based only on name or similarity scoreLong-term creep service without sourced time–stress–temperature datachipping, cracking, grinding damage or distortion when toughness and carbide volume are not matched to the tool
Applications & Processing

Industrial applications and processing

Typical applications

  • Punches, dies and blanking tools
  • Industrial blades, knives and cutting tools
  • Cold-forming, drawing and cold-rolling tools
  • Wear-resistant machine and surface-contact components
  • blanking and forming dies
  • punches, shear blades and gauges
  • cold extrusion and drawing tools
  • wear-loaded tooling and precision inserts

Manufacture, welding and surface engineering

Weldability has an internal index of 20/100 (very low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.

Forming and forging depend on steel family, delivery condition and the grade-specific qualified temperature range.

  • Select nitriding, induction hardening or coating against chemistry, substrate hardness and application.
  • Keep coating-deposition temperature compatible with the tempering condition and substrate.
  • Control hydrogen embrittlement, residual stress and distortion in high-strength components.
Engineering Conclusion

Engineering conclusion and selection recommendation

1.2379 / X153CrMoV12 is worth evaluating when the principal need is high resistance to abrasive wear and plastic deformation in tooling. Internal indices of hardness 98/100, toughness 17/100, impact 12/100 and wear 98/100 must be aligned with the real failure mechanism. The leading risk is chipping, cracking, grinding damage or distortion when toughness and carbide volume are not matched to the tool. Final approval requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition, heat treatment and heat-specific MTC.

Engineering analysis
Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel
Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions

What is 1.2379 / X153CrMoV12 steel?

A high-carbon high-chromium ledeburitic cold-work tool steel associated with 1.2379/D2, emphasizing abrasive wear resistance and compressive strength.

What are the main applications of 1.2379 / X153CrMoV12?

Application contexts include Punches, dies and blanking tools, Industrial blades, knives and cutting tools, Cold-forming, drawing and cold-rolling tools and Wear-resistant machine and surface-contact components, subject to the product standard and actual condition.

How hard can 1.2379 / X153CrMoV12 be?

Hardenable; actual hardness depends on chemistry, section size, austenitizing, quench and tempering. Internal screening index: 98/100 (very high).

Is 1.2379 / X153CrMoV12 suitable for impact loading?

Impact resistance is indexed at 12/100 and toughness at 17/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.

What is the service-temperature limit of 1.2379 / X153CrMoV12?

Temperature-dependent behavior varies with condition, exposure time, environment and product form; use sourced values for design. 150–300 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.

Can 1.2379 / X153CrMoV12 be replaced by a close grade?

Approve substitution only after matching chemistry, specification, product form, condition, heat treatment and MTC.

Steel Comparison

Engineering steel comparison

Compare this grade with any other dossier. Scores from 0 to 100 are internal screening indices, not laboratory values or allowable design stresses.

Close suggestions:
Current grade1.2379 / X153CrMoV12Cold Work Tool Steels
VS
Selected gradeAISI D2Cold Work Tool Steels

Current-grade chemistry

Second-grade chemistry

Current-grade heat treatment

Second-grade heat treatment

Current-grade applications

    Limitations

      Second-grade applications

        Limitations

          Select a second grade to update the comparison.

          Sources & Evidence

          Sources, methodology and evidence

          Sources support grade identity, recorded values or the engineering method. General guidance does not replace product-specific certification.

          Grade-specific sources

          BÖHLER K110 — 1.2379 / X153CrMoV12 / D2Manufacturer data sheet · Tier A

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: manufacturer datasheet.

          View source
          Uddeholm Sverker 21 technical dataManufacturer data sheet · Tier A

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: manufacturer datasheet.

          View source
          steelnumber.comDesignation cross-reference · Tier B

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: identity crosswalk.

          View source
          stahldaten.deOfficial material-number register · Tier A

          Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: official material number register.

          View source

          Methodology and analysis sources

          TWI — Carbon equivalent formulae in relation to hydrogen cracking

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Outokumpu — Corrosion resistance and PRE/PREN

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Uddeholm — Cold work tooling technical guide

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Ovako Steel Navigator — Steel grades and material data sheets

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Laxcon Steels open grade dataset — CC BY 4.0

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source
          Uddeholm — Orvar Supreme product data sheet

          Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.

          View source

          Dossier reviewed: 2026-08-25 · Evidence status: Sourced numerical data plus engineering analysis

          Steel selection and availability

          Contact us for alloy-steel selection

          Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel

          +98 912 240 7139