1.4520
Moda 430Ti/4520
1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520 is a Ferritic Stainless Steels grade centred on moderate corrosion resistance, low nickel content and a ferritic structure with low thermal expansion. This dossier separates sourced values from engineering guidance and comparison indices.
Complete introduction and metallurgical analysis
1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520 belongs to Ferritic Stainless Steels and selection centres on moderate corrosion resistance, low nickel content and a ferritic structure with low thermal expansion.
1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520 is a Ferritic Stainless Steels grade centred on moderate corrosion resistance, low nickel content and a ferritic structure with low thermal expansion. This dossier separates sourced values from engineering guidance and comparison indices.
The principal recorded elements are C≈0.02%, Cr≈16.2%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits.
The expected microstructure is predominantly ferritic matrix with grain growth and sensitisation controlled during welding and heat exposure; delivery condition, section size, melt quality and processing history can change that state.
Comparison indices are hardness 38/100, toughness 49/100, impact 52/100, wear 38/100 and bending 62/100. These are internal indices, not standard test results.
The screening temperature range is 350–800 °C; strength or hardness loss, oxidation, exposure time and creep must be assessed separately.
A representative process route is forming and welding with controlled heat input, followed by cleaning and passivation where specified. Obtain actual temperatures, times and cooling media from the grade and product data sheet.
Manufacturing indices are weldability 58/100, machinability 58/100, corrosion resistance 62/100 and fatigue resistance 47/100; use them for screening only.
The principal risk is loss of toughness, grain coarsening or localised corrosion after unsuitable welding or exposure. Evaluate geometry, surface condition, environment and the governing failure mechanism together.
A similar name or calculated relationship is not proof of interchangeability; match chemistry, specification, condition, heat treatment and MTC.
Engineering conclusion: 1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520 is a rational candidate when useful oxidation and general corrosion resistance with low thermal expansion matches the real load, environment and certified product condition.
International equivalents and designations
A close counterpart is not automatically interchangeable. Confirm chemistry, product standard, delivery condition, dimensions and heat treatment.
Chemical composition and the role of each element
The principal recorded elements are C≈0.02%, Cr≈16.2%. Mid-range values support engineering interpretation and do not replace purchase limits. Composition is shown for screening and traceability. The current purchase standard and the heat-specific MTC remain authoritative.
| Element | Weight-percent range | Metallurgical role and effect |
|---|---|---|
| C | ≈ 0.02 % | Carbon raises hardness, strength and carbide potential; excessive carbon can reduce toughness and weldability. |
| Cr | ≈ 16.2 % | Chromium promotes hardenability and carbide formation and, at sufficient levels, corrosion or oxidation resistance. |
Outokumpu range datasheet — typical chemical composition, % by mass Sourced with conditions
Engineering behaviour and selection response
Ferritic and not martensitically hardenable; properties are controlled by chemistry, cold work and annealing. Internal comparison index: 38/100.
Engineering analysisToughness has an internal index of 49/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisImpact resistance has an internal index of 52/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisBending resistance has an internal index of 62/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisAbrasive wear has an internal index of 38/100 (low). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisCorrosion resistance has an internal index of 62/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisWeldability has an internal index of 58/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisMachinability has an internal index of 58/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisTemperature behavior is grade- and environment-specific; no single universal maximum service temperature applies. Internal comparison index: 45/100.
Engineering analysisCreep resistance has an internal index of 45/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisFatigue resistance has an internal index of 47/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Engineering analysisNumerical scores are internal comparison indices. They are not standard test results, allowable design stresses or a manufacturer guarantee. Data Method
Hardness and hardenability
Ferritic and not martensitically hardenable; properties are controlled by chemistry, cold work and annealing. Internal screening index: 38/100 (low).
low
Comparison indexGoverning factors
- Chemistry and section size
- Austenitising and quench severity
- Tempering temperature and time
- Test method and surface preparation
Data limits
Final acceptance requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition and heat-specific MTC.
Toughness, impact and fracture behaviour
Impact resistance is indexed at 52/100 and toughness at 49/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.
- Microstructure, hardness and grain size influence impact tolerance.
- Sharp radii, notches and surface defects reduce fracture resistance.
- Test temperature, specimen direction and section must be identified.
- For critical parts, accept impact energy only from a documented test of the same condition.
Service temperature, thermal stability and creep
Temperature behavior is grade- and environment-specific; no single universal maximum service temperature applies. 350–800 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.
Continuous service
350–800 °CEngineering guidanceReview the limit against strength or hardness loss and exposure time.
Intermittent service
Do not assign an intermittent limit without product-specific source data.
Tempering and phase stability
Working and coating temperatures must remain compatible with the tempering condition and required microstructure.
Oxidation and environment
Oxidation or corrosion may become limiting before the strength criterion.
The relative creep index is 45/100 (moderate). It is not an allowable creep stress or rupture-life value.
Do not select this grade for long-term static high-temperature loading from the internal index alone.
Wear resistance and surface behaviour
Abrasive wear
The abrasive-wear index is 38/100; final hardness, carbides, microstructure, contact mode and lubrication govern actual resistance.
Comparison indexAdhesive wear
Assess adhesive wear with the counterface material, lubrication, roughness, pressure and temperature.
Engineering analysisSurface improvement
Evaluate surface treatment or coating only after confirming compatibility with chemistry, substrate and process temperature.
Engineering guidanceMechanical and physical properties
The record contains 2 sourced mechanical-property rows; each applies only to its stated condition, dimensions and test temperature.
| Property | Value | Condition | Dimension | Test temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield strength Rp0.2 | ≥ 200 MPa | Cold-rolled strip in the cited product condition | According to the product data sheet | 20 °C |
| Elongation A | ≥ 24 % | Reference elongation in manufacturer table | According to the product data sheet | 20 °C |
Physical properties
Heat-treatment stages and process controls
The representative family route is forming and welding with controlled heat input, followed by cleaning and passivation where specified. Numerical temperatures are shown only when supported by the record.
Annealing / stress relief
Engineering guidanceAssess the supply condition, residual stress, section size and prior machining before selecting time and temperature.
Cooling: Grade- and process-specific coolingAnnealing / stress relief
Engineering guidanceAssess the supply condition, residual stress, section size and prior machining before selecting time and temperature.
Cooling: Grade- and process-specific coolingPreheating and austenitising
Engineering guidanceSet preheat steps and austenitising parameters from the grade/product data sheet and actual section size.
Cooling: Grade- and process-specific coolingQuenching / controlled cooling
Engineering guidanceChoose the quench medium and cooling severity against hardenability, geometry, distortion and crack risk.
Cooling: Grade- and process-specific coolingTempering / property adjustment
Engineering guidanceSet tempering or ageing to the required hardness, toughness and service-temperature balance.
Cooling: Grade- and process-specific coolingHardness, toughness, impact, temperature and process charts
Chemistry data retain their evidence label; 0–100 charts are internal indices and stages without temperature are process sequences.
Multi-axis engineering profile
Comparison indexChemical composition
Derived from source dataHardness–toughness balance
Comparison indexToughness, impact and fatigue
Comparison indexWear and surface response
Comparison indexMechanical properties or comparison indices
Sourced with conditionsService temperature
Engineering guidanceHeat treatment
Engineering guidanceRelated-grade similarity
Comparison indexAll comparison indices
Comparison indexPotential failure modes and selection guidance
Potential failure mechanisms
- loss of toughness, grain coarsening or localised corrosion after unsuitable welding or exposure.
- Fatigue initiation from surface defects, section transitions or stress concentration.
- Property loss after unsuitable heat treatment, cooling or finishing.
- Corrosion, oxidation or environmental attack when protection is inadequate.
Selection and design notes
- Match designation, material number, product standard and supply form before purchase.
- Compare the governing failure mechanism with hardness 38, toughness 49, impact 52 and wear 38 indices out of 100.
- Use mechanical values only within their cited condition, dimensions and test temperature.
- Confirm the heat-treatment route and target hardness with the processor before final machining.
- Review the heat number, MTC and required test results before release.
Derived calculations
Calculated from recorded inputs; apply only within the stated formula scope and limitations.
Advantages, limitations and unsuitable applications
Advantages
- useful oxidation and general corrosion resistance with low thermal expansion.
- A clearly labelled engineering profile supports comparison with related grades.
- Grade identity, chemistry, counterparts and references remain traceable in one dossier.
Limitations and weaknesses
- loss of toughness, grain coarsening or localised corrosion after unsuitable welding or exposure.
- A 0–100 index cannot be converted into design stress, impact energy or creep life.
- Hardness and toughness depend on section, delivery condition and actual processing.
- Do not approve a substitute before checking the product standard and heat-specific MTC.
Cases requiring caution or an alternative material
Industrial applications and processing
Typical applications
- Cold-forming, drawing and cold-rolling tools
- Exhaust and turbocharger components
- Structures, bridges, profiles and transmission components
- Automotive powertrain, chassis or formed components
- Architectural and formed components
- automotive exhaust and trim parts
- appliances and architectural panels
- mildly corrosive process components
Manufacture, welding and surface engineering
Weldability has an internal index of 58/100 (moderate). Actual performance requires a documented product condition, heat treatment and test context.
Forming and forging depend on steel family, delivery condition and the grade-specific qualified temperature range.
- Clean and passivate after fabrication or welding where the specification requires it.
- Electropolishing may be used where cleanliness or corrosion performance requires it.
- Prevent free-iron contamination and preserve the specified surface condition.
Engineering conclusion and selection recommendation
1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520 is worth evaluating when the principal need is useful oxidation and general corrosion resistance with low thermal expansion. Internal indices of hardness 38/100, toughness 49/100, impact 52/100 and wear 38/100 must be aligned with the real failure mechanism. The leading risk is loss of toughness, grain coarsening or localised corrosion after unsuitable welding or exposure. Final approval requires the current standard, product form, dimensions, delivery condition, heat treatment and heat-specific MTC.
Engineering analysisFrequently asked questions
What is 1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520 steel?
1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520 is a Ferritic Stainless Steels grade centred on moderate corrosion resistance, low nickel content and a ferritic structure with low thermal expansion. This dossier separates sourced values from engineering guidance and comparison indices.
What are the main applications of 1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520?
Application contexts include Cold-forming, drawing and cold-rolling tools, Exhaust and turbocharger components, Structures, bridges, profiles and transmission components and Automotive powertrain, chassis or formed components, subject to the product standard and actual condition.
How hard can 1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520 be?
Ferritic and not martensitically hardenable; properties are controlled by chemistry, cold work and annealing. Internal screening index: 38/100 (low).
Is 1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520 suitable for impact loading?
Impact resistance is indexed at 52/100 and toughness at 49/100. These are not Charpy or Izod energy values; temperature, orientation, geometry and actual microstructure govern component behaviour.
What is the service-temperature limit of 1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520?
Temperature behavior is grade- and environment-specific; no single universal maximum service temperature applies. 350–800 °C is a screening range or sourced limit according to its evidence label. Check strength loss, oxidation, creep, exposure time and environment.
Can 1.4520 / Moda 430Ti/4520 be replaced by a close grade?
Approve substitution only after matching chemistry, specification, product form, condition, heat treatment and MTC.
Engineering steel comparison
Compare this grade with any other dossier. Scores from 0 to 100 are internal screening indices, not laboratory values or allowable design stresses.
Current-grade chemistry
Second-grade chemistry
Current-grade heat treatment
Second-grade heat treatment
Current-grade applications
Limitations
Second-grade applications
Limitations
Select a second grade to update the comparison.
Sources, methodology and evidence
Sources support grade identity, recorded values or the engineering method. General guidance does not replace product-specific certification.
Grade-specific sources
Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: manufacturer range page.
Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: manufacturer datasheet.
Reference supporting grade identity or recorded values; interpret it within the cited product and condition context. Role: official material number register.
Methodology and analysis sources
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Reference supporting the calculation method or the limits of the engineering analysis.
Dossier reviewed: 2026-08-25 · Evidence status: Sourced numerical data plus engineering analysis
Contact us for alloy-steel selection
Shaygan Steel — the right choice in alloy steel